9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Dan Albert
98e8fc88bd
Add bug link for refuelzonegeometry. 2022-11-20 16:07:01 +01:00
Dan Albert
5de94843ea
Fix mistake in join point placement.
This looks like it was just a typo. We want to join as late as possible
to allow flights coming from other airfields to take the best route to
the target that is safe, rather than joining as early as possible, which
isn't useful since pre-join and post-split are supposed to be safe areas
anyway.
2022-09-17 14:35:11 +02:00
Dan Albert
9e2e4ffa74 Update pydcs, adapt to new Point APIs.
This is briefly moving us over to my fork of pydcs while we wait for
https://github.com/pydcs/dcs/pull/206 to be merged. The adaptation is
invasive enough that I don't want it lingering for long.
2022-02-23 01:02:48 +00:00
SnappyComebacks
532ac261ff
Ability to plan tanker recovery for strike like flights (#1729)
* Initial refueling definitions.

* Adding refuel definitions.

* Initial functionality changes

* Regenerate package when adding refueling flight.

* Recursively change package waypoint.

* Fix mypy errors.

* Regenerate flight plans when tanker is added to package.

* Give tanker better starting position on package recovery.

* Add TOT calculation for refueling waypoint.

* Timing changes to Strike split point and Refueling start time.

* Add correct waypoint builder for refuel in tarcap and sweep.  Remove restrict afterburner on refuel point.

* Always generate a refuel point for a package.

* Less arbitrary altitude in Refuel track start time calculation.

* Refueling waypoint no longer optional.

* Fix mypy gen error.

* Better discrimination of which tanker flight plan to make.

* Remove refuel tot calculations.

* Remove package regeneration on tanker flight addition.
2021-11-12 21:37:34 -07:00
Dan Albert
be69d17345 Move Flight and its related components out of gen. 2021-10-22 11:30:28 -07:00
Dan Albert
e22e8669e1 Add fallback locations for join zones.
It's rare with the current 5NM buffer around the origin, but if we use
the hold distance as the buffer like we maybe should it's possible for
the preferred join locations to fall entirely within the home zone. In
that case, fall back to a location within the max-turn-zone that's
outside the home zone and is nearest the IP.
2021-07-18 14:52:12 -07:00
Dan Albert
82cca0a602 [3/3] Rework hold points. 2021-07-15 23:21:56 -07:00
Dan Albert
d444d716f5 [2/3] Improve join point placement. 2021-07-15 23:18:10 -07:00
Dan Albert
e03d710d53 [1/3] Rework IP placement.
Test cases:

1. Target is not threatened.

   The IP should be placed on a direct heading from the origin to the
   target at the max ingress distance, or very near the origin airfield
   if the airfield is closer to the target than the IP distance.

2. Unthreatened home zone, max IP between origin and target, safe
   locations available for IP.

   The IP should be placed in LAR at the closest point to home.

3. Unthreatened home zone, origin within LAR, safe locations available
   for IP.

   The IP should be placed near the origin airfield to prevent
   backtracking more than needed.

4. Unthreatened home zone, origin entirely nearer the target than LAR,
   safe locations available for IP.

   The IP should be placed in LAR as close as possible to the origin.

5. Threatened home zone, safe locations available for IP.

   The IP should be placed in LAR as close as possible to the origin.

6. No safe IP.

   The IP should be placed in LAR at the point nearest the threat
   boundary.
2021-07-15 23:18:10 -07:00