Like with most other GroundObjects now the Buildings also will use the Heading defined in the campaign miz and will place and rotate the generated TGO accordingly there.
- Give user information about the heading of a TGO
- Add a button to change the heading to head to conflic
- Change the orientation of a TGO during Buy
- Run the heading to conflict calculation to change the orientation of the newly bought group. It will then head to the center of the conflict
ForceGroup loading failed due to wrong unit parsing and prevented factions without naval units to load before the first faction with naval units got loaded (this affected the Allies 1940 and 44 factions)
The new introduced layout system extends the mission generation so that a campaign designer can now define the heading of the ground objects which will be also used later in mission generation to orient the group accordingly. This removes the randomization of the orientation from the generation.
Most campaigns will not need any updates and will work out of the box.
added the fill property to the layout groups which allows to specify if a optional layout group should be filled with a faction accessible unit if it was not defined by the preset groups. This is usefull to allow more generalized templates which for example may or may not have a Search Radar without adding one to all layouts (example: Rapier and Roland Sites which use the generic SHORAD layout)
this fixes an issue which prevented optional units like logistics to be added to the forcegroup if they were not defined in the preset group yaml
- Generalize Hawk, Rapier, Roland, SA-2, SA-3, SA-11, HQ-7, NASAMS
- One layout miz with 6 Launchers
- Two general layout yamls for 6 and 4 Launchers using the same miz
- Split up the SHORAD layout (one with TELAR units and one with Track Units)
This allows unique identification across saves. The front-end needs to
be able to differentiate the first carrier in game A and the first
carrier in game B, but because carriers (and other non-airfield CPs) are
assigned IDs sequentially, collisions were to be expected. The front-end
can't tell the difference between a reloaded game and a new turn, so we
need to ensure different IDs across games.
This is a handy cleanup anyway, since callers constructing CPs no longer
need to manually track the CP ID counter.
Fixes https://github.com/dcs-liberation/dcs_liberation/issues/2078.
During package planning we don't care about the details of the flight
plan, just the layout (to check if the layout is threatened and we need
escorts). Splitting these will allow us to reduce the amount of work
that must be done in each loop of the planning phase, potentially
caching attempted flight plans between loops.
Split the oversized file into one per plan type. This also moves the
layout responsibility out of the oversized FlightPlanBuilder and into
each flight plan type file.
