Removing the per-transit type supply routes allows us to find the best
route from A to B even if the unit needs to switch transit modes along
the way.
The "best" route is the one that will generate better gameplay. That is,
convoys are preferred to ships (use cases for GMT are rare in DCS), and
ships are preferred to airlift (reasons to attack cargo ships are also
rare). Avoiding airlift is also a good strategic choice generally since
it consumes aircraft that could be performing other missions.
The extreme weight against airlift in the pathfinding algorithm could
probably be scaled way down so that airlift would be given preference
over a very long trip, possibly only for urgent transfers.
Later when we add rail that will probably be given the most preference,
but possibly between road and shipping.
https://github.com/Khopa/dcs_liberation/issues/823
The simple form of this works, but without the multi-mode routing it'll
only get used when the final destination is a port with a link to a port
with a factory.
These also aren't targetable or simulated yet.
https://github.com/Khopa/dcs_liberation/issues/826
Downside to the current implementation is that whether or not transports
that were purchased last turn will be available for airlift this turn is
arbitrary. This is because transfers are created at the same time as
units are delivered, and units are delivered in an arbitrary order per
CP. If the helicopters are delivered before the ground units they'll
have access to the transports, otherwise they'll be refunded. This will
be fixed later when I rework the transfer requests to not require
immediate fulfillment.
https://github.com/Khopa/dcs_liberation/issues/825
Historically this inherited from Event but there was no reason for that.
That's gone now. Finish the separation and move the unit order tracking
class out of the combat results reaction class's file.
The previous flight plan only makes sense if the convoy will make it a
significant distance from its starting point. At road speeds over the
typical mission duration this is not true, so we can actually plan this
as if it was a strike mission near the origin point and that's close
enough.
There's some cleanup work to do here that I've added todos for.
Fixes https://github.com/Khopa/dcs_liberation/issues/996
This currently is only supported for player flights. I have no idea how
to create an AI flight plan that won't just get them killed. AI-only BAI
missions against supply routes will warn the player on mission creation.
A CP with a factory would be able to supply itself, but was not in a
supply route if it was the only connected friendly CP. When the player
starts with only one base against an enemy base this meant that it was
in no supply route, causing it to not be a recruitment location or a
place to buy more than a reserve of vehicles automatically.
The purchase system will seek out a source for its units when the
purchase is completed. If no source is available the order will be
refunded. Orders with no source available are prevented, so this only
happens when the source was cut off from the destination during the
turn.
There's still some funkiness going on with the first turn (but possibly
only when the first turn includes a cheat to capture) where the AI buys
a ton of units somewhere other than the front line. First turn behavior
should probably be different anyway, with the first turn allowing
purchases anywhere to avoid empty front lines while troops reinforce if
the front line isn't a factory.
https://github.com/Khopa/dcs_liberation/issues/986
This also removes the "factory" type from the normal strike target
(money generating) generators to avoid confusion. Later only control
points with factories will be able to spawn ground units, at which point
these will no longer generate income.
https://github.com/Khopa/dcs_liberation/issues/986
This is used to provide a UI hint to guide players towards campaigns
that have been updated to work with the current version of the game.
All the campaigns we currently have were made for an unknown version of
the game, so they're all flagged as incompatible.
The version field is not the DCS Liberation version number because the
campaign format may change multiple times during development. Instead
the version number is a monotonically increasing integer that we
increment whenever a game change requires campaign updates.
* A Bluefor EWR 55GS in the campaign miz defines an optional EWR site. There is no distinction between how close or far it is to a base, so it's possible that there will be many EWRs within an airbase.
* A Redfor EWR 1L13 in the campaign miz defines a required EWR site.
It would be a good future idea to limit the amount of EWRs within a certain distance from an airbase. That way there's no chance of 5 EWRs all at the same airbase. Even better if there were something preventing any two EWRs from being right next to each other.
No campaigns take advantage of this yet.
Fixes https://github.com/Khopa/dcs_liberation/issues/524
Still a work in progress (the missions don't actually perform their task, just orbit). Currently:
* AEW&C aircraft can be bought.
* AEW&C missions can be planned at any control point and at front lines.
* AEW&C will return after 4H or Bingo.
Allowing these to grow infinitely leads to some really weird behaviors
when the enemy has been buying reserves long enough, where capturing a
base might result in 80 enemy vehicles suddenly at the gates.
This is just an interim fix. Ideally these units would be reinforcing
the front line as needed
(https://github.com/Khopa/dcs_liberation/issues/382), and a CP could be
lost without needing to completely destroy the defender.
If there are not airbases withing ferry range with available parking for
the aircraft then the aircraft will be captured and sold. Otherwise the
aircraft will retreat to the closest available airbase.
Fixes https://github.com/Khopa/dcs_liberation/issues/693
If the captured base has no connection to other friendly objectives (the
base was encircled) then the enemy equipment will be captured and sold.
Otherwise the units will retreat toward connected bases.
Partial fix for https://github.com/Khopa/dcs_liberation/issues/693.
Still need to fix this for air units.
We were never resetting the dead state for repaired SAMs. Rather than
tracking that manually, determine liveness from the number of units left
alive.
For building objectives where the group is not assigned to the TGO until
*mission* generation time we still need manual tracking.
(cherry picked from commit d3b1f6110f23b72c67d2ab86585087115004390d)
We were never resetting the dead state for repaired SAMs. Rather than
tracking that manually, determine liveness from the number of units left
alive.
For building objectives where the group is not assigned to the TGO until
*mission* generation time we still need manual tracking.
Some SAMs have multiple groups (such as an SA-10 group with its
accompanying SA-15 and SA-19 groups). This shows each group's threat and
detection separately on the map, and also makes it so that an SA-10 with
dead radars will no longer contribute to the threat zone just because
the shilka next to it still has a functioning radar.
https://github.com/Khopa/dcs_liberation/issues/647
Fixes https://github.com/Khopa/dcs_liberation/issues/672
