The workflow UI works best if there's only a single main workflow in a
PR. We can keep things organized similarly by turning the test workflow
into a reusable workflow. Same code (mostly), better UI.
This is just the first step to prove the concept. Most of the work done
in our workflows can be split into separate jobs to parallelize the
workflow. This will also make the checks page more readable.
This change alone probably won't speed up CI much.
Shapely doesn't have a Windows wheel on pypi yet, but we can get them
from https://www.lfd.uci.edu/~gohlke/pythonlibs/#shapely. This unblocks
(and because wheels are matched to python versions, *requires*)
upgrading to Python 3.10.
GitHub has limits on the number of files that can be used with
upload-artifact, and it sounds like it will also be faster to compress
locally before uploading.
The upload-artifact version 2.3 has problems with 0byte files and prevent the build action from beeing completed.
This temporary fix should be reverted when they fixed the bug.
This appears to be incompatible with pyinstaller. I get the following
when trying to run the executable generated with pyside6:
```
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "qt_ui\main.py", line 29, in <module>
File "PyInstaller\loader\pyimod03_importers.py", line 476, in exec_module
File "qt_ui\windows\QLiberationWindow.py", line 28, in <module>
File "PyInstaller\loader\pyimod03_importers.py", line 476, in exec_module
File "qt_ui\widgets\map\QLiberationMap.py", line 11, in <module>
ImportError: could not import module 'PySide6.QtPrintSupport'
```
* Use TACAN channels more selectively
* Increase tacan range to 126
* Use pytest and add workflow
* Skip faction tests due to outdated test data
* Run mypy on tests directory also
* Use iterators for bands AND usages, add tests
