When a new flight is added to a package, if the TOT is early enough the
new flight might have a startup time in the past. Clamp the TOT when
adding new flights to the package to avoid this.
https://github.com/dcs-liberation/dcs_liberation/issues/1680
This makes the start time in WaitingForStart dynamic, which is more
expensive but probably still cheap enough.
It also checks that the new TOT will not result in a start time in the
past when the player changes the TOT.
https://github.com/dcs-liberation/dcs_liberation/issues/1680
This is by no means complete. The bugs that this solves were already in
6.x, but we'd hidden the speed controls for the sim in that release, and
have always said that anything done after pressing "go" the first time
is undefined behavior. This is the first step on making those mid-sim
actions behave correctly.
UI actions such as creating a new package need to be executed between
ticks of the sim. We can either do this synchronously by blocking the UI
until the tick is done executing, acquiring a lock on the sim, executing
the action, then releasing the lock; or asynchronously by queueing
events and letting the sim execute them when it completes the current
tick (or instantly if the sim is paused).
Anything that comes from the new UI (currently just the map) must be
asynchronous because it goes through the REST API, but for the old UI
it's simpler (and because the lock will only be acquired as quickly as
the user can act, shouldn't slow anything down) to do this
synchronously, since it's difficult to use coroutines in Qt.
https://github.com/dcs-liberation/dcs_liberation/issues/1680
It sounds like PySide2 will not be moving to Python 3.11, so we're stuck
on 3.10 without this. Upgrading to a newer Qt also fixes some high DPI
bugs (the file browser dialog for save/load is no longer tiny on 4k).
https://github.com/pyinstaller/pyinstaller/issues/5414 previously
blocked this, but the bug appears to be fixed now.
We can always estimate a startup time now. Remove the nullability from
the result, cleanup the callsites, and eliminate
TotEstimator.mission_start_time since it no longer does anything useful.
Rather than polling at 60Hz (which may be faster than the tick rate,
wasting cycles; and also makes synchronization annoying), collect events
during the tick and emit them after (rate limited, pooling events until
it is time for another event to send).
This can be improved by paying attention to the aircraft update list,
which would allow us to avoid updating aircraft that don't have a status
change. To do that we need to be able to quickly lookup a FlightJs
matching a Flight through, and Flight isn't hashable.
We should also be removing dead events and de-duplicating. Currently
each flight has an update for every tick, but only the latest one
matters. Combat update events also don't matter if the same combat is
new in the update.
https://github.com/dcs-liberation/dcs_liberation/issues/1680
This appears to be incompatible with pyinstaller. I get the following
when trying to run the executable generated with pyside6:
```
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "qt_ui\main.py", line 29, in <module>
File "PyInstaller\loader\pyimod03_importers.py", line 476, in exec_module
File "qt_ui\windows\QLiberationWindow.py", line 28, in <module>
File "PyInstaller\loader\pyimod03_importers.py", line 476, in exec_module
File "qt_ui\widgets\map\QLiberationMap.py", line 11, in <module>
ImportError: could not import module 'PySide6.QtPrintSupport'
```
This is an attempt to remove a lot of our supposedly unnecessary error
handling. Every aircraft should have a price, a description, a name,
etc; and none of those should require carrying around the faction's
country as context.
This moves all the data for aircraft into yaml files (only one converted
here as an example). Most of the "extended unit info" isn't actually
being read yet.
To replace the renaming of units based on the county, we instead
generate multiple types of each unit when necessary. The CF-18 is just
as much a first-class type as the F/A-18 is.
This doesn't work in its current state because it does break all the
existing names for aircraft that are used in the faction and squadron
files, and we no longer let those errors go as a warning. It will be an
annoying one time switch, but it allows us to define the names that get
used in these files instead of being sensitive to changes as they happen
in pydcs, and allows faction designers to specifically choose, for
example, the Su-22 instead of the Su-17.
One thing not handled by this is aircraft task capability. This is
because the lists in ai_flight_planner_db.py are a priority list, and to
move it out to a yaml file we'd need to assign a weight to it that would
be used to stack rank each aircraft. That's doable, but it makes it much
more difficult to see the ordering of aircraft at a glance, and much
more annoying to move aircraft around in the priority list. I don't
think this is worth doing, and the priority lists will remain in their
own separate lists.
This includes the converted I used to convert all the old unit info and
factions to the new format. This doesn't need to live long, but we may
want to reuse it in the future so we want it in the version history.
This gives a clean break between the transfer request and the type of
transport allocated to make way for transports that need to switch
types (to support driving to a port, then getting on a ship, to a train,
then back on the road, etc).
https://github.com/Khopa/dcs_liberation/issues/823
UI isn't finished. Bulk transfers where the player doesn't care what
aircraft get used work (though they're chosen with no thought at all),
but being able to plan your own airlift flight isn't here yet.
Cargo planes are not implemented yet.
No way to view the cargo of a flight (will come with the cargo flight
planning UI).
The airlift flight/package creation should probably be moved out of the
UI and into the game code.
AI doesn't use these yet.
https://github.com/Khopa/dcs_liberation/issues/825
This adds the models and UIs for creating ground unit transfer orders.
Most of the feature is still missing:
* The AI doesn't do them.
* Transfers can move across the whole map in one turn.
* Transfers between disconnected bases are allowed.
* Transfers are not modeled in the simulation, so they can't be
interdicted.
https://github.com/Khopa/dcs_liberation/issues/824
Previously we were trying to make every potential flight plan look
just like a strike mission's flight plan. This led to a lot of special
case behavior in several places that was causing us to misplan TOTs.
I've reorganized this such that there's now an explicit `FlightPlan`
class, and any specialized behavior is handled by the subclasses.
I've also taken the opportunity to alter the behavior of CAS and
front-line CAP missions. These no longer involve the usual formation
waypoints. Instead the CAP will aim to be on station at the time that
the CAS mission reaches its ingress point, and leave at its egress
time. Both flights fly directly to the point with a start time
configured for a rendezvous.
It might be worth adding hold points back to every flight plan just to
ensure that non-formation flights don't end up with a very low speed
enroute to the target if they perform ground ops quicker than
expected.
