There isn't any UI observable behavior of the dragend of the waypoint,
but we can test that the backend was called. The only uncovered parts of
that component are now error paths, but the error handling in that
component is to just ignore errors, so there's also nothing to test
there.
Unlike the other map tests which heavily rely on mocks, this one uses
React refs to inspect the constructed leaflet objects. The DOM itself
doesn't appear to contain anything worth testing against (react-leaflet
rendering doesn't work like typical React rendering).
This required some infrastructure changes:
1. Forwarded ref from WaypointMarker to Marker so the test can observe
it. Added a mergeRefs helper (and its own tests) to make that easier.
2. Switched from identity-obj-proxy to jest-transform-stub, because the
former doesn't produce a useable image for imports, and we need
usable images for leaflet to be able to render.
This doesn't yet test drag and drop behavior since that requires mocking
the backend, and this commit is already complicated enough. That'll be
next.
The flight plan used to not include a waypoint for departure, so a few
places would create one for the sake of the UI, or were built to assume
there was a missing waypoint that was okay to ignore. At some point we
added them to the flight plan, but never updated the UI, so the waypoint
list in the flight dialog started counting from 1 instead of 0, and the
openapi endpoint wrongly reported two departure waypoints to the front-
end.
Fixes https://github.com/dcs-liberation/dcs_liberation/issues/3037.
DCS AI cannot yet use LGBs.
A2G loadouts for anti-unit have been switched to CBU-97s, which appear
to be the most effective weapon type.
A2G loadouts against static targets (OCA/aircraft, OCA/runway, strike)
have been change to Mk82s and Mk84s.
The old DCS AI F-15E is sticking around because the two have very
different weapon sets for now, so it's probably better to use the AI-
only one for squadrons that don't expect players.
I've avoided renaming the old one (we probably should name it "... (AI)"
for clarity) because the rename will break save compat. I have added a
_new_ name that new campaigns can use though.
https://github.com/dcs-liberation/dcs_liberation/issues/3028
This PR fixes a regression introduced in
https://github.com/dcs-liberation/dcs_liberation/pull/2792 where
refactoring meant that scenery deaths were not tracked correctly.
This PR has been tested by striking a scenery target and confirming that
it appears in state.json and is updated in Liberation. I've also
confirmed that ground units are tracked.
