We were setting up all the correct *target* waypoints but the AI doesn't
use the target waypoints; they use the targets property of the ingress
waypoint. This meant that the flight plan looked correct in the UI and
was correct for players but the tasks were set up incorrectly for the AI
because building TGOs are aggravatingly multiple TGOs with the same name
in the implementation.
Mission targets now enumerate their own strike targets so that this
mistake is harder to make in the future.
This won't be perfect, the AI is still not able to parallelize tasks and
since buildings aren't groups they can only attack one structure at a
time, but they'll now at least switch to the next target after hitting
the first one.
As a bonus, stop bombing the dead buildings.
Fixes https://github.com/dcs-liberation/dcs_liberation/issues/235
Fixes https://github.com/dcs-liberation/dcs_liberation/issues/244
Loadout selection no longer has two (disagreeing) implementations. What
the UI shows is now what the miz will have.
We now store the chosen layout in the Flight *always*, not just for
custom loadouts. This means that we do loadout lookups at the start of
each turn, but the data is cached in pydcs.
Era-specific loadout degradation is still done at generation (and
presentation) time. This is so that players can toggle that option and
have it affect the *current* turn, rather than the next one.
This gives a clean break between the transfer request and the type of
transport allocated to make way for transports that need to switch
types (to support driving to a port, then getting on a ship, to a train,
then back on the road, etc).
https://github.com/Khopa/dcs_liberation/issues/823
UI isn't finished. Bulk transfers where the player doesn't care what
aircraft get used work (though they're chosen with no thought at all),
but being able to plan your own airlift flight isn't here yet.
Cargo planes are not implemented yet.
No way to view the cargo of a flight (will come with the cargo flight
planning UI).
The airlift flight/package creation should probably be moved out of the
UI and into the game code.
AI doesn't use these yet.
https://github.com/Khopa/dcs_liberation/issues/825
Still a work in progress (the missions don't actually perform their task, just orbit). Currently:
* AEW&C aircraft can be bought.
* AEW&C missions can be planned at any control point and at front lines.
* AEW&C will return after 4H or Bingo.
DCS features a massive range of aircraft and land vehicles, and not all of them make their role(s) clear just from the name alone. What this commit does is add an "information" button (and resultant window) to the recruitment section. This should allow new players to understand what each unit is/does.
Current state - every aircraft has a country of origin and an introduction date for that variant. Some also have a small placeholder description, taken from ED's store page for that aircraft. There is also a placeholder picture (taken from a rejected image from my own personal photography) that will, in time, show a banner image of each unit.
Todo - add appropriate screenshots for each aircraft's banner, replace the placeholder text for each aircraft (this will take a while...) and add more data points for each unit type, such as a unit role (i.e. "air-superiority fighter", "multirole fighter", etc) or perhaps a list of weapons carried. I also haven't made a start on the huge number of ground units yet.
This makes the names of the aircraft displayed to the player in the UI more verbose and readable.
It allows allows specific countries to display an aircraft's name differently. An example of this would be the JF-17 Thunder, which is known in China as the FC-1 Fierce Dragon - this now displays correctly in the Liberation UI.
Mildly breaks save compat with 2.3; All existing flight dialogs will be
broken, passing the turn or recreating all the flights in the UI will
allow you to continue
Not converting all at once so I can prove the concept. After that we'll
want to cover all the cases where an int distance or speed is a part of
the save game (I've done one of them here with `Flight.alt`) so further
cleanups don't break save compat.
https://github.com/Khopa/dcs_liberation/issues/558
Breaks save compat because it adds new fields to `Flight` that have no
constant default. Removing all of our other save compat at the same
time.
Note that player flights with a divert point will have a nav point for
their actual landing point. This is because we place the divert point
last, and DCS won't let us have a land point anywhere but the final
waypoint. It would allow a LandingReFuAr point, but they're only
generated for player flights anyway so it doesn't really matter.
Fixes https://github.com/Khopa/dcs_liberation/issues/342
BAI is used for attacking ground vehicles as opposed to buildings like
strike does, and not air defenses like DEAD does. Unlike strike, BAI is
tolerant of moving targets.
Fixes https://github.com/Khopa/dcs_liberation/issues/216
Fighter sweeps arrive at the target ahead of the rest of the package
(currently a fixed 5 minute lead) to clear out enemy fighters and then
RTB.
Fixes https://github.com/Khopa/dcs_liberation/issues/348
- B52, A-20, and Tu-22 will level bomb targets
- When there is an unit group as target, all the units are now engaged instead of only the first unit of the group
Previously we were trying to make every potential flight plan look
just like a strike mission's flight plan. This led to a lot of special
case behavior in several places that was causing us to misplan TOTs.
I've reorganized this such that there's now an explicit `FlightPlan`
class, and any specialized behavior is handled by the subclasses.
I've also taken the opportunity to alter the behavior of CAS and
front-line CAP missions. These no longer involve the usual formation
waypoints. Instead the CAP will aim to be on station at the time that
the CAS mission reaches its ingress point, and leave at its egress
time. Both flights fly directly to the point with a start time
configured for a rendezvous.
It might be worth adding hold points back to every flight plan just to
ensure that non-formation flights don't end up with a very low speed
enroute to the target if they perform ground ops quicker than
expected.
Stop using "CAP". Use BARCAP or TARCAP instead.
TARCAP no longer allowed anywhere but front lines, since that's all we
have mission planning for right now. Later will add TARCAP and BARCAP
for all objective types with different timing profiles.
Part two of the fix for
https://github.com/Khopa/dcs_liberation/issues/210.
Reasonable ground speed depends a lot on altitude, so plumb that
information through to the speed estimator.
Also adds calculations for ground speed based on desired mach. I don't
know if DCS is using the same formulas, but we should at least be
pretty close.
We estimate the longest possible time from mission start to TOT for
all flights in a package and use that to set the TOT (plus any delay
used to stagger flights). This both cuts down on loiter time for
shorter flights and ensures that long flights will make it to the
target in time.
This is also used to compute the start time for the AI, so the
explicit delay option is no longer needed.
Also fixes the CAP racetracks so the AI actually stays on station.
Waypoint TOT assignment happens at mission generation time for the
sake of the UI. It's a bit messy since we have the late-initialized
field in FlightWaypoint, but on the other hand we don't have to reset
every extant waypoint whenever the player adjusts the mission's TOT.
If we want to clean this up a bit more, we could have two distinct
types for waypoints: one for the planning stage and one with the
resolved TOTs. We already do some thing like this with Flight vs
FlightData.
Future improvements:
* Estimate the group's ground speed so we don't need such wide margins
of error.
* Delay takeoff to cut loiter fuel cost.
* Plan mission TOT based on the aircraft in the package and their
travel times to the objective.
* Tune target area time prediction. Flights often don't need to travel
all the way to the target point, and probably won't be doing it
slowly, so the current planning causes a lot of extra time spent in
enemy territory.
* Per-flight TOT offsets from the package to allow a sweep to arrive
before the rest, etc.
Make the type of the waypoint a non-optional part of the constructor.
Every waypoint needs a type, and there's no good default (the previous
default, `TAKEOFF`, is actually unused). All of the target waypoints
were mistakenly being set as `TAKEOFF`, so I've fixed that in the
process.
Also, fix the bug where only the last custom target of a SEAD
objective was being added to the waypoint list because the append was
scoped incorrectly.
The first waypoint is automatically added by pydcs, so it's not
actually in our waypoint list from the flight planner. Import is from
the group so it shows up in the kneeboard.
I've been wrongly importing these from `pydcs.dcs` instead of just
`dcs`, because that was what PyCharm thought they were. These will all
be broken when we get back to using a real pydcs instead of relying on
its directory being in our tree.
This page in the wiki should be updated:
https://github.com/Khopa/dcs_liberation/wiki/Developer's-Guide
Instead of recommending that `PYTHONPATH` be updated in the run
configuration, it should instead recommend that Settings -> Project:
dcs_liberation -> Project Structure be set to exclude the pydcs
directory from the dcs_liberation content root, and add the pydcs
directory as a *separate* content root.
Alternatively, we could recommend that configure a virtualenv (good
advice anyway, and pycharm knows how to set them up) that have people
run `pip install -e pydcs`.
I think even easier would be switching from the virtualenv-style
requirements.txt to pipenv, which can actually encode the `-e` style
pip install into its equivalent of requirements.txt.
Add central registries for allocating TACAN/radio channels to the
Operation. These ensure that each channel is allocated uniquely, and
removes the caller's need to think about which frequency to use.
The registry allocates frequencies based on the radio it is given,
which ensures that the allocated frequency will be compatible with the
radio that needs it. A mapping from aircraft to the radio used by that
aircraft for intra-flight comms (i.e. the F-16 uses the AN/ARC-222)
exists for creating infra-flight channels appropriate for the
aircraft. Inter-flight channels are allocated by a generic UHF radio.
I've moved the inter-flight radio channels from the VHF to UHF range,
since that's the most easily allocated band, and inter-flight will be
in the highest demand.
Intra-flight radios are now generally not shared. For aircraft where
the radio type is not known we will still fall back to the shared
channel, but that will stop being the case as we gain more data.
Tankers have been moved to the Y TACAN band. Not completely needed,
but seems typical for most missions and deconflicts the tankers from
any unknown airfields (which always use the X band in DCS).
